Saturday, 8 May 2010

Aida ROH

(Photo pinched via Mrs MC :-) as i will readily admit! If the author recognises it please let me know and i will happily acknowledge the copyright! I tried in vain to find one in the papers but everybody focused on the blood and gore and i wanted to start this with what I liked MOST and this is it :-)


I found it interesting how well the contrast was perceptible between the first and second part. In the first two acts you get overwhelmed by the “paganism” of the society, the sheer brutality and violence of war and the power ingrained within its hierarchy. Even in the scene between Amneris and Aida this is evident and rightly so, because it is a display of power.

I liked it at a second viewing even more and I guess I will settle in with it the more I see of it. It gains when seen from above and at a distance. From close up the turning back wall is ugly, there is no confusion about it. Real, piece of scrap-ugly. From above things change in an interesting way. The floor becomes an interesting and much better visible combination of sandstone like edges and steel blue stone in the centre area. I also realised from above why/how the temples gets created by lifting the back edge of the sandstone floor and the tomb in the end by lifting the front edge. Yes, visually it’s not that striking and works from close up front stage only appreciatively. From above the support structure of the floor pieces is less visible and the whole geometry works better. Somebody should really box up the skeleton beneath the floor pieces and it would become more like a building block and less like pieces of wood ripped out of the construction. I understand from interviews and comments that budget as tighter than initially planned and some cuts had to be made, but it should have been obvious that in parts the sets are just too rudimentary and don’t really meld all that well with the costumes sometimes. However, while I have issues with the grey wall and the lifting floor, which while cleverly engineered, could have been better executed visually there are bits that I do like, for example the shades in Amneris’ chamber and the interesting table with a large basin with inlays in the same, the backdrop to the Nile scene suggesting some kind of dark water, the stone floor, which I wouldn’t have minded seeing continued in the walls, the light pitches in the prayer scene, etc.

The lighting is fabulous, gloomy dark in the fist part and intimate in the second. And the costumes are beautiful. Although it is true that you can’t really distinguish visually between Aida’s people and Radames’, the former are there for such a short period of time that the lack of contrast doesn’t bother me all that much. One thing I always appreciated about McVicar and his costume designer colleagues is that they obviously care about the singers, in that they want them looking the best they can and feeling as comfortable as possible. Cast members have said publicly how comfortable they feel in the costumes and there is no doubt that the look beautiful. Ok, so Amneris might not be a good example for comfortable ;-))) But buy does she look fantastic and regal! The make up and hairpiece are amazing and I’d love to be her for one day and wear all of that! And one night I’m going to break in and steal that Aida costume! I’m in love with it! Yes, I know they are OTT, but this is theatre! And since at least in Radames society it is implied women have real power, it fits that they should be overly adorned, while the men are dressed in natural and neutral colours of grey and shades of brown. I like Radames’ costumes very much and I think they work very well for Mr Alvarez who looks like the warrior he is supposed to be. And in the love duets with Aida, their contrasting looks work well visually, suggesting a nice touch of romantic fantasy.

I also found the red cloth Radames carries to be a clever idea. It is a token of wars fought, drenched in dried blood and passed on to the next army leader as a sign of good luck in battle. In the triumphal scene Radames returns with it displaying it, drenched anew in enemy blood. Brutal yes, but interesting :-)

Copyright Bill Cooper/ROH from the Express

On the brutal cue, the ballet&sacrifice scenes, that some found so shocking, I’d say they are only mildly so and again on repeat viewing what lasts is the brutality rather than the more than usual amount of flesh on display. And so it should as the clear intention is to display a society preparing for war in a almost frenzied way. I too had the impression the dance scenes were somehow “unfinished”, raw. It seems unlikely that they should have been rushed and really work in progress. My impression is that the impact is intentional, bringing it into reality and away from a staged effect. For example in the triumphal scene the movement is very well coordinated with the music but the dancers look more like men coming back from battle and displaying their skills than dancers performing a choreography. Yes, there is a lot of flesh on display but the feeling of so much muscle covered in blood is indeed rather scary.

Where I think this whole concept of keeping it rather real and not “prettying it up” has not worked so well is in the scene in Amneris chambers. It’s pretty in your face sensual all right … but it made me giggle because it looked rather more like clumsy amateurs giving Kamasutra a try and not really succeeding much. I think a tiny bit more of artsy ballet skillz would have gone a long way in making this more convincing and um…. flexible ;-)

But all in all, this is a long way of being boo-worthy! It might not be the grandest and greatest Aida and it is worth tweaking a bit more on the future maybe, but it is a valid concept. And if you look away from some of the imperfect details the big picture that emerges works around some clear ideas. I never felt the brutality and cruelty that riddles the score so poignantly before, it becomes much more evident under McVicars dark light.

On to the actual show and more importantly, the music.. (I’ve send the second and third performance)

On both nights the whole show took a while to get going and it continued building up to the 3rd act. Probably also because the pouring rain outside triggered more coughing than usual. I could have strangled them that is how persistent some were in the piani passages…
Once it had ignited it was really good. I want to say straight away how sorry I am to not have had the chorus bow on either of the nights, They deserve applause and praise! Wonderful diction and the piano beginning to the prayer scene is amazing!!! I do have a bit of the quibble in the judgement scene though… It is one of my favourites and I like the priests to sound a bit more powerful, the sound here was slightly obscured by the grey ugly wall. It also is the single scene in the whole show where I also would have liked the music to be a bit more incisive. I missed a bit more of the ring of doom in the music and a heavier, slightly longer silence in between questions to weigh the atmosphere down even more. It is the only moment when I wished for a slightly slower pace, but again this is just personal taste. All in all I enjoyed, nay, savoured Luisotti’s conducting!!! I really love Verdi, but because it is so tuneful, few get the music right and take it seriously. It spite of somebody telling me Verdi must have enjoyed his cheese writing this I definitely think it should not sound cheesy :-)

(Besides, just because you remember Verdi after hearing it once does not take away any of it’s genius, quite the contrary; too many look down all too often on this particular talent he had of creating “operatic hits”. If it’s so light and easy, why didn’t others do it as well as he did time and time again? Maybe because nobody else could do it quite as spectacularly and naturally :-) Which is not to say the stuff you can’t sing in the show is not as nice, of course it is, there are many shades of beauty, many ways to take out breath away with music. But make you feel like this music belongs to you from the first time you hear it is also a thing of extraordinary beauty! Verdi’s gift to us :-)

So Aida should be grand and crushing and exciting and uplifting and touching and tender and intimate, and so good that you stop to listen, not sing along in your mind :-) For me Luisotti got it absolutely right! It was wonderful glorious Verdi. And he drove those ensemble moments with decision and passion reminding me once more that nobody really could create ensembles like Verdi.

Photo from the Daily mail

Marianne Corentti is a fierce Amneris and she has vast experience with the role which of course is evident on stage and the public connects to her immediately. It’s also quite amazing that she pulls of the amazingly complicate costume as if she wore this every day :-) She looks and sounds impressive and the power in her voice is a good match for Amneris’ constant power display. On the 2nd night the energy was really flying between her and Alvarez’ Radames in the confrontation scene in the last act. And her torment in the judgment scene, when she realises where her own inability to deal with feelings in any other way than flinging her power about has lead to, is very real and touching.

And I really really liked Marcelo Alvarez’Radames. Ive heard him before, but never live :-) I did think the role could be taking him to the limits and sometimes it probably does, but he stays always on the safe side and the singing is never other than elegant. His voice is beautiful and he gives it his all on stage. I was really impressed how believable a character he made Radames and although maybe some of the dramatic passages in the role take more effort, the lyrical passages are made for him! I don’t care what people may have said, he suits the role very well and it suits him! There were also for him some wonderful details like when he kneels in front of Aida when she rejects him or his hurt when he realises she has tricked him. He sings with utmost passion and commitment and his voice carries the nobility and dignified rage as well as the romantic tones well, he convinces both as the soldier and the lover. The Nile scene was riveting and the scene between Radames and Amneris which follows was the best of the whole show in the first night I went! It left everyone literally breathless and even the coughers were stunned! At the end of it I felt like jumping up and shouting Bravi Bravi! That is how much I loved it! I still get goosebumps thinking about it.
His diction was always impeccable and it was thanks to him that the lyricism and the beauty of the final scene came across in the first performance.

By the next one he owned the role even more, as did everyone, which kind of proves that if you can it is always better to go to the show further in the run as things will have smoothed out:-) The Nile duet between Aida and Radames was really beautiful and on the Il ciel dei nostri amori come scordar potrem… I felt really breathless! Micaela Carosi as Aida also brought a warmer tone to her singing that in the first night and the O patria mia, non ti vedrò mai più! was really heartfelt and full of emotion. Compared to the first night the Nile scene was definitely the winner on the night, both duets Aida Amonasro and Aida Radames being really well done. Equally beautiful and more touching the final duel in the tomb; I this production I definitely prefer the intimate scenes in the second part, I think musically as well as visually.

Photograph: Neil Libbert for the Observer


I personally liked Marco Vratogna’s Amonasro. His ultradramatic voice works very well for the authoritarian figure and literally pierced through the orchestra in some of his incisive lines. He may feel a tad young to be Aida’s father, but he dominates with such authority that nobody would doubt is position as the warrior king. He is probably the best actor in the entire cast and he has real stage presence, the pressure he exercises over Aida is palpable.

Robert Lloyd still has the warmth and depth of voice for a King :-) It still and always is a pleasure to hear and see him again. Having heard his Philip in the Don Carlo from Paris I was slightly underwowed by Giacomo Prestia. He gives a solid performance, but I guess I expected him to have somewhat more authority and punch in his voice.

I enjoyed it the second time more than the first and am happily looking forward to seeing and above all hearing it again one more time before the run end. If you can get a ticket go and listen and watch and make up you own mind about it :-)

Aida
May 01, 04 2010 ROH
Giuseppe Verdi
Director David McVicar
Set designs Jean-Marc Puissant
Costume designs Moritz Junge
Lighting design Jennifer Tipton
Choreography Fin Walker
Martial Arts David Greeves

Performers
Conductor Nicola Luisotti
Aida Micaela Carosi
Radames Marcelo Álvarez
Amneris Marianne Cornetti
Amonasro Marco Vratogna
Ramfis Giacomo Prestia
King of Egypt Robert Lloyd
Priestess Elisabeth Meister§
Messenger Ji-Min Park

PPS To my “cheesy friend” ;-) Thanks for giving me the opportunity to get this particular beef off my chest, I have been wanting to declare my undying love for Verdi for quite some time now ;-))))) If Verdi liked his gorgonzola and mozzarella, yumm! So do I :-))))) Laaaa donna e moooobile, qual piiiumaaaa al ventooooo.... Actually, no! Cause that is still partially on my top 3 black list... Beeeella figliaa dell'aaaaaamore, schiiiiiavo son dei vezzi tuuuuooooooi......

Rant!

And now the rant….
I’ve gritted my teeth because I really wanted at least to say my bit about Aida without further delay. I’ve slept about 5h last night but I felt I owe a considerable lot of overdue thoughts on various things I’ve seen and heard that I decided to forego the nap and do some writing this afternoon… I felt properly knackered after last night’s JDF concert and this morning’s Traviata rehearsals (both were gorgeous beyond words!) but in good spirits until I read this…

Anonymous said...
Is this a blog about Jonas Kaufmann or opera in general? I don't know. I enjoy articles here but there are many other great singers too that deserve recognition. Just my opinion.

I hope the Aida post reads half decent and is not full of …. Because not much inspiration was left :-(

I don’t like people being anonymous, because I prefer talking to somebody specific, but fair enough, readers are generally anonymous. So there goes the lengthy and unnecessary explanation.

First of all, thanks for reading. I am not sure from your comment which articles you mean… Obviously I wouldn’t be writing if I didn’t care at all if anyone reads or not. And I am happy if I’m remotely more entertaining than a sleeping pill ;-) From my side things were and are obvious, but since on the other side they may not be, as it appears, here are some answers to some questions you and others may or seem to have.

This is my blog. My, as in private female person. I am not a critic (thank God! ;-))) nor do I have the adequate studies or background to even remotely be one. I don’t get paid for writing ( I wish ;-) ) but I enjoy it ( I know very well it is not of any literary or other writing quality). It is just an expression of my passion for music. These posts can’t be called “articles” as they are nothing more than mere thoughts surrounding performances I have seen or heard.

I’ve always liked classical music and opera in particular (as the Wagner quote should have hinted to). For me music and opera are a lifetime joy (more than 30 years to be exact)! And I am lucky enough to live close to one of the best theatres in the world, the ROH (as again the blog clearly says). I don’t intend or pretend to either inform anyone about opera, or teach or God forbid preach about it! If you wish to know more about opera, get yourself a ticket and experience!! You’ll know more after 3 hours than I could ever tell anyone about it. Or buy Cds, or read a book, or check Wikipedia. I am not Encyclopaedia Britannica (or Germanica, or Hispanica or Operatica, or any other …ica). Sheesh, don’t put this kind of pressure on me or I’m gonna’ crawl right out from under that rock!

I’m a lover, not an expert :-) So this is not the view of the world or any judgment or qualification on opera, either in general, or in particular about one or the other performance or singer. It’s about my view, my taste, my skewed image of the opera world and my memories and impression of things I see and hear. It’s about what I like or dislike, what i adore and abhor. I realise everyone’s tastes are different and people will agree, disagree, hate or like what I say and I may like or disagree with their views. It’s about tastes, not absolute judgements and everyone is entitled to disagree with anything I say, just as I am entitled to my own taste :-)

I respect the views of others and expect others to respect mine. And I greatly enjoy discussing these views, others and mine, and to be honest even more if we contradict than if we agree. It makes things fun and interesting.

If you’re still reading and still wondering what this blog is about, well, let’s spell it out, shall we, because this is really what some of you want to know:

No, it is not a blog about Jonas Kaufmann…except it is, when I have seen a performance of his ;-))))

But really, with 10 or so he wasn’t such a great Manrico (beats me if he will ever be one..), so maybe I was listening to other people as well, hm?

Fact: my top 3 favourite operas (ok that changes as well, fickle as I am, but the ones which most frequently make the top) are not even stuff he sings.
Fact: I see many things (good for me! And lucky me!)
Fact: I work 12 and more hour workdays, so take a wild guess when do I write??? Only when:
- I still remotely feel like staring into a screen for 3-4 more hours;
- My fingers are not numb yet and I can go a couple more hours without sleep
- I feel inspired ( yes, even crappy blog scribblers get writer’s bock)
- Friends haven’t squeezed the hell out of me to share all impressions into the smallest details (which is when I don’t bloody feel like repeating it all over again in writing!)

So that is sadly how more than 50% of things never get written up…

Fact: I like listening to (beware I like tenor and baritone voices more than sopranos;-)): Corelli, Callas, Vargas, Schipa, Gigli, Bjorling, Tebaldi, Scotto, Simionato, Herlea, Milnes, Bastianini, Melchior, Schipa, Volpi, Zeani, Gheorghiu, Alagna, Cosotto, Cappuccilli, Domingo, Panerai, Pavarotti, Sutherland, Nilsson, Dessay, Villazon, Florez, Jaho, Keenlyside, Goerne (and I am getting bored here…)

Fact: I like Verdi, Wagner, Mozart, Bellini, Donizetti, Massenet, Bizet, Gounod, Berlioz, Berg, ok, some Puccini too… (it’s getting really boring…)

And do you really want me to start listing the operas??? … I thought not ;-)

Fact: I my own opinion ;-) Jonas Kaufmann is an extraordinary artist and I find his singing enjoyable and absolutely amazing most of the times. Currently, he is the live tenor voice that I most enjoy listening to and he is a mean actor, which makes the show fun to watch as well. Thus a more profound impression which inspires me to write :-) But i’ve seen more Jk’s performances than I write about (there are those 4 Lohengrins I saw and I still want to share my thoughts about…)

Other facts: there is a bunch of other opera related stuff that I wish I had time to write about, like a Bible thick with rants on bookings at opera houses around the world (promise, that one will come one of these days!)

Questions, comments, stones to throw? Feel free to do so :-) I might answer….

Friday, 23 April 2010

24th April TOSCA from the Met on your radio

Update (thanks for the info little ghost!) :-) For all those who have missed it first time around here is another chance to hear the marvellous Tosca from the Met Broadcast):

Giacomo Puccini: "Tosca"Samstag, 08. Mai 2010,

19:30 WebRadio Ö1 (this would be 18,30 in UK)

http://oe1.orf.at/programm/tag/20100508

---------------------

Isn't it just amazing what the adrenaline rush of the 2nd act transformed itself into in act3? It was definitely one of the most beautiful renditions i have ever heard. Not even the applause at the end of Lucevan was able to cut through the emotional web of it. I cannot be thankful enough to Luisi, this amazing orchestra, Jonas and Ms Racette for making time almost stand still. I lingered on every single note, on every word and this last half and hour (as well as the entire show) will stay with me for a loooooong loooooooong looooooooong time. I am grateful not only for the music and the singing, but above all for feeling so deeply touched.


Dolci mani..... and now i can... live happily ever after!

ohhhh!! If you hear a BIG bang it's because i have just exploded with pride!! That was an exquisite Vittoria! and Carnefice!!!!. Soooo made in Jonas! It sounded incredibly easy breezy (not because it is, but because he knows how do it best :-) It was clear and powerful and may i say elegant???? It stopped when the music wanted it to stop and he sounded like he could have gone on for more, but didn't :-) And that was one of the clearest, smartest sung Carnefice i ever heard from him. Every single word was audible and understandable and it still packed a punch! I'm just going to keep gloating for a while.... So very very very well done JK!!!


More: Is it wrong to want to throw yourself at this Scarpia fellow? I can just feel myself floating towards him.... this is magnetism!!!

And the public, don't touch another bloody espresso in the intermission!!!! Sit on your hands if you must, but pleasseeee don't clap before JK stops singing!! Just enjoy those precious notes till the end and let me enjoy them too... God!

And Racette sounds just gorgeouusss!!! Hach!

Update right now: OMG.... OMG!!!!!! what a feast!!! and the voices feel like they are trickling down my spine... pure opera-heaven!!

Tosca divinaaaa......


Photo: Cory Weaver/Metropolitan Opera via BBC Radio3 page

So tomorrow almost everyone get's a chance to listen:

1pm NY time, 6pm London time, 7pm CET time (and for others check out here).

According to the NY Times: "‘TOSCA’ Luc Bondy’s production of “Tosca,” the much-debated staging that opened the Metropolitan Opera’s season and elicited vociferous boos for the creative team, is back. But the new cast is terrific, which makes a huge difference. The soprano Patricia Racette is a deeply expressive and impassioned Tosca; the dashing tenor Jonas Kaufmann triumphs as Cavaradossi, singing by turns with burnished power and plaintive pianissimos; and the towering bass-baritone Bryn Terfel is a menacing and mesmerizing Scarpia. There is only one more chance to hear this cast, conducted with sweep and intensity by Fabio Luisi. "

You can listen:
In the US search for your station on the Met page here

Bayern Klassik here (you can listen by clicking right where it says Live horen or here )

France Musique here (click left on écouter le direct)

BBC Radio 3 here (click above right on the Listen live iplayer or on the right on this blog the BBC3 widget) --> with pictures and details as always :-)
RTV Radio Classica here (click above right where it says Radio classica en directo, Haz click para escuchar)
Enjoy and in bocca al lupo to everyone on the Met stage and in the pit :-)
........
It seems my overdose of Tosca has somehow triggered my subconsciousness. Although because of its originality I kept mentioning the Carsen Tosca I saw in Zurich, what has been almost haunting me these last 2 weeks is the ROH Tosca I saw a few years ago. Until about an hour or so ago I wouldn’t even have been able to tell you if it was 2007 or 2008….

Reading the papers and various reviews these days I kept getting strangely nostalgic because I have heard Jonas Kaufkmann’s first Tosca a the ROH and tomorrow I will hear it from the Met. There have been various in between, but reading about the Met Tosca somehow brought me closer to the first one than any of the others…

I still lived in Edinburgh back then and I booked a Tosca at whim because I hadn’t seen any in a while. The cast was known except for Mario, who was tba when I booked. The shows were barely half sold when the run began and nobody liked the production much. Pappano was to conduct.

And conduct he did! There is a before an after for me with Tosca thanks to Pappano. He made Puccini sound beautiful, emotional, romantic and passionate and most of all real. All was done and he took us as deep or as high as one can imagine without ever overdoing it. He kept the beat of our hearts always louder than the music and for the first time in my life i hang on every single note of this score.

Then there was this newborn-Mario, who made us giggle and melt, who suddenly made not only two arias but all duets stand out, who sung Vittoria from all fours and grabbed Scarpia by his collar to shout him Carnefice in the face! And who together with Pappano created the most amazing 3rd act I have ever heard. For the first time in my life there was no applause after Lucevan! ( Not once, not twice, in none of the three performances I went to..) Because an audience of 2200 followed Mario’s every last breath, because the spell could and would not be broken ( a lady next to me stopped her husband from clapping with a begging gesture). Because this Mario hugged the wooden stump where he would be shot as if it was Tosca’s form, his tortured hands tremblingly caressing it as if his lover’s curves. Because this Mario knew he was going to die, because he sang the sweetest “dolci mani” and brought many in the audience to tears with his “parlami ancora come dianzi parlavi … ”. I’ve never seen people cry at the end of Tosca before, even before Mario is shot.

How is it done? No idea, ask JK! It just seams it is not about the piani, the high notes , the long notes or whatever.. It is about what Mario feels and how he feels it, about his life and death, about his love of art and freedom, and above all his love for Floria.

But there is such a thing like a Tosca where you are too touched to applaud; I know because I remember how it felt to be there.

The whole run sold out after the first performance and I remember going straight to the box office the morning after the first one and buying my next ticket. And the next.. And had I not been sternly advised that 3 were enough! I would have gladly trotted back down from Edinburgh for one more :-)

And guess what I just found out? It’s how this blog started! I’ve never remembered what I first wrote about… Seems my subconscious did ;-) And it wanted me to remember those Toscas these days… because it is almost exactly two years ago :-)
You are welcome to go searching and read it if you like :-) But, it’s in Spanish ( kind of pompous sounding some of it, what was I thinking???). turns out I always was a lazy/sloppy writer… I my first post ever about an opera I call JK.. well, JK:-) ( I am thereby demanding copyright!) I said he was “polifacetico” ( I know!! Pompous of me..) and I go on saying about Vittoria and Carnefice that they are a perfect pairing of freedom and despair, release and vengeance :-) ( hmm, still agree with some of that:-) Not surprisingly I was already waxing on and on and on about some “Quale occhio al mondo” and “dolci mani” (the latter still is my favourite bit of the entire score..).

Anyway, that Tosca was special, still is special so I want to remember and I wish to celebrate! So tomorrow’s is definitely much more than just one more Tosca! :-)

And no matter if anyone tells me how many are enough or too many, I will say : I’ll be the judge of that, and at the moment I am looking forward to many many many more (and hoping that one day I’ll relive the “too beautiful to applaud” one ).

I just wish I was sitting there live tomorrow to be able to copy paste my first post ending :

...Viendo la sonrisa traviesa de crío que le sale a JK en los bravos, gritos y aplausos me entro la risa acordándome de las palabras de Floria:Oh, come la sai benel'arte di farti amare!

Well, nothing here to stop me from having a giggle during curtain calls tomorrow :-)
Turns out i probably do like Tosca as an opera after all ;-))